Agentic AI pilot case study
How we frame and ship agent pilots inside regulated, high-accountability environments.
AI is not the same as software. With traditional software you ship a stable product and the customer adopts it. With AI you are deploying something that keeps evolving as models, capabilities, and best practices change every few months, and those changes often reshape the workflow itself. The old "deliver it and walk away" model simply does not fit.
Forward deployed engineering closes that gap. We put strong technical people directly alongside the operators and subject-matter experts who own the outcome. That proximity forces the work to solve the actual problem instead of a sanitized version of it, and it lets us extract the tacit knowledge, build the evaluations, and close the production feedback loop that make AI dependable at scale.
An embedded engineer or small pod working next to your operators and domain experts, mapping the real workflow and where humans and agents each step in.
Secure connection of agents to your data and internal systems, with scoped access, entitlements, monitoring, and logging designed in from the start.
Evaluations that reflect how your work actually breaks, plus a production feedback loop so the system measurably improves from real outcomes.
Change management, enablement, and a clear handover path so the new human-plus-agent process holds up as models and best practices keep shifting.
Organizations moving from chat experiments to agents that participate in real, revenue- or service-critical workflows.
Leadership teams that want a dedicated, accountable partner to bring automation to their teams instead of leaving it to every individual employee.
Regulated enterprises — banking, insurance, pharma, public sector — with decades of legacy systems and data that must be made safely usable by AI, with the right access controls, logging, and human-in-the-loop oversight.
The exact stack depends on the problem, but these are the design principles we usually optimize for.
Engineers work inside your context, alongside the people who own the outcome, so decisions are grounded in the real problem rather than a slide-deck version of it.
We extract the undocumented know-how that lives with your subject-matter experts and encode it into the prompts, tools, retrieval, and evaluations an agent can actually use.
Agents sit inside real workflows and improve from actual decisions, with evaluations that capture how things genuinely fail and a loop that feeds the learnings back in.
Because models and best practices change constantly, we design for continuous improvement and keep your workflow current as upgrades change what is possible.
ETH Zürich and EPFL-trained engineers with consulting and regulated-delivery experience, comfortable embedding directly in high-accountability environments.
The hard parts of agentic work — instructions, context, intervention, review, and integration — stay in scope, so you get reliable work product instead of impressive demos.
These are the kinds of questions that usually matter before a team commits to scope, architecture, and rollout.
If this is close to what your team needs, these pages are the best next places to look.
How we frame and ship agent pilots inside regulated, high-accountability environments.
How embedding, evaluation, and operational handover are built into the way we deliver.
Start with a scoped conversation about the workflow you want to bring agents into.